China To End Subsidies On 'Famous Brands' Manufacturing

China To End Subsidies On 'Famous Brands' Manufacturing

A- A+
Το περιεχόμενο του άρθρου δεν είναι διαθέσιμο στη γλώσσα που έχετε επιλέξει και ως εκ τούτου το εμφανίζουμε στην αυθεντική του εκδοχή. Μπορείτε να χρησιμοποιήσετε την υπηρεσία Google Translate για να το μεταφράσετε.

James A. Morrissey, Washington Correspondent

China has agreed to eliminate dozens of subsidies supporting the export of so-called "famous brands" in a move that U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) Ron Kirk says will "level the playing field" for U.S. manufacturers of a wide range of products. The subsidies were the subject of a World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute initiated by the U.S. government in the face of what it believed were illegal subsidies under WTO rules.

Kirk said the agreement is designed to resolve U.S. concerns raised in a WTO case the United States initiated in December 2008. He said the United States had challenged a Chinese industrial policy that generated a "vast number" of central, provisional and local government subsidies promoting increased worldwide recognition and sales of famous brands for merchandise.

While the subsidies in some cases applied to textiles and apparel, the action is not seen by U.S. textile manufacturers as a major step toward addressing what they believe is an ongoing problem with illegal Chinese subsidies. However, Cass Johnson, president of the National Council of Textile Organizations, said he is pleased that the USTR has shown an interest in addressing the question of illegal Chinese subsidies. Retailers and other importers of textiles and apparel do not feel this particular issue is of major importance, but they do feel it is important for China to live up to its WTO obligations, and where illegal subsidies are found, they should be eliminated.

The famous brand subsidies were given to Chinese manufacturers to help them develop private label brands that would compete with other apparel products. The U.S. government challenged the subsidies, saying they gave China an unfair advantage that denied U.S. manufacturers the chance to compete fairly with them in the United States and third-country markets.

newsletter

Εγγραφείτε στο καθημερινό μας newsletter