Looking at Cover Crops from Three Perspectives
Looking at Cover Crops from Three Perspectives

Looking at Cover Crops from Three Perspectives

A- A+
Το περιεχόμενο του άρθρου δεν είναι διαθέσιμο στη γλώσσα που έχετε επιλέξει και ως εκ τούτου το εμφανίζουμε στην αυθεντική του εκδοχή. Μπορείτε να χρησιμοποιήσετε την υπηρεσία Google Translate για να το μεταφράσετε.

By Jim Steadman

After years of research and on-farm use of cover crops, there’s little doubt of the management benefits received by properly planting and terminating the cover. But there are differing perspectives on the value of cover crops that growers need to consider.

A panel discussion at this year’s Beltwide Cotton Conferences looked at three sides of the cover crop story – soil health, weed management and insect management – as presented by Dr. Bill Robertson, University of Arkansas Extension cotton specialist, Dr. Larry Steckel, University of Tennessee Extension weed specialist, and Dr. Don Cook, Mississippi State University Research Entomologist.

Here – in their own words – are their thoughts.

Dr. Bill Robertson – Soil Health

“When you look at a healthy soil by volume, about half of that volume should be your mineral component – sand, silt and clay – along with organic matter. The other half of the soil volume should be pore space – space for water, space for air. And, in compaction, we squeeze the pore out of our soil. There’s just not that much room for air and water in our soil. I’ve worked with farmers who try to put out more than ½” with a pivot irrigation system, and it runs off because we can only get so much water in the soil at a time.

“For cotton to be more sustainable, the two things that will have the greatest impact on shrinking our environmental footprint is to reduce tillage and use a cover crop. When I work with someone to get a cover crop on a field, I can often sell the concept of having residue for weed suppression. But for me, the main reason I plant a cover crop is to improve water infiltration and reduce compaction.

“When we look at the microbes in the soil, there’s bacteria, fungi, nematodes and more. There are a ton of nematodes out there and most of them are good. And fungi in the soil help break up cellulose.

“For example, I went to a conventionally-tilled cotton field with no cover crop, buried a pair of underwear, waited five weeks and pulled it up. There was very little change or breakdown of the cotton fiber. I did the same thing in another field with a cover crop, and basically got cotton strings. It’s a visual representation of what’s going on in soil with some of the things that you can’t see but are out there helping us. Feeding the soil microbes is what excites me about using a cover crop. And everywhere we’ve done a cover crop study, we’ve doubled the amount of water infiltration.”

Dr. Bill Robertson (center) shows the results – or lack thereof – from research to study the breakdown of cotton fibers in a field without cover crops to Dr. Don Cook (left) and Dr. Larry Steckel (right).

Dr. Larry Steckel – Weed Management

“I got into cover crops because we started seeing that Roundup was no longer working on our driver weeds. It became very clear that we needed something that we couldn’t pour of a jug if we were going to be sustainable long-term on these weeds. We just don’t have a lot of new herbicides coming.

“If you decide to go with a cover crop, then the question becomes what cover crop and when do you burn it down? The first cover crop a lot of growers used was planted to keep sandblasting down so cotton could get a good start. And it does help with that a lot. But the cover crop and the population they were using were good for mitigating sandblasting, but it wasn’t robust enough to give a lot of good weed control. After going through a lot of iterations, we’re now looking at a blend of a grass – either rye or wheat – with a legume. We could get enough biomass out of that consistently to give us good weed control early on, as well as a lot of other benefits.

“The other thing is timing of termination. The closer to planting, the better off you are from a weed control standpoint. We have some recent work done looking at allelopathy. For Palmer amaranth, you can get some residual control from that allelopathy – often about 14 days before pigweed starts coming up. But termination has to be close to planting. And there you get to the green bridge, which entomologists don’t like.

“Looking at our research, you can cut down the number of pigweed that come up by 50%. That puts you way ahead of the game. From a resistance management standpoint and the way we’re using auxin technologies, a cover crop can help extend the life of those products before we start seeing resistance. Plus, you can delay the pigweed emergence by about 40 days, depending on the cover crop used and how robust it is. That gives you a lot longer window for timely applications from a weed control standpoint.”

Dr. Don Cook – Insect Management

“While there are benefits to cover crops, nothing in life is free. Entomologists have been accused of being anti-cover crop. We just want growers to be aware that they’re not going to be able to manage this year in and year out like they have when they do burndown in February or March or plant into clean fields. There’s going to be some additional management.

“There hasn’t been as much cover crop work in cotton recently under situations where we’re talking about terminating as close to planting as possible. There have been studies done in Georgia in the past about planting into dead wheat residue, and that has some real benefits on thrips. The adults have trouble finding the cotton seedlings in that dead residue. But we never saw cutworms in cotton until we started planting behind a legume and terminating close to planting.

From an insect management standpoint, we recommend that any vegetation – whether it’s something that was planted or just grew naturally – be dead a minimum of three weeks prior to planting. If growers wait to terminate cover crops at planting, they need to be prepared for additional management, whether it’s a pyrethroid at planting for cutworm or the potential for spider mite issues coming off of henbit or vetch that they kill at or after planting.

“I hope I’m wrong. But when we get into cover crops on a bigger scale, we’re going to have more situations where we say ‘I’ve never seen this before.’ There are a lot of unknowns. I see potential for pests like wireworms and Southern corn rootworm that are typically not found in cotton. Current seed treatments are going to be effective more than likely. But we’re shaving seeding rates back to try to save money. Those treatments may kill them, but we may also lose a stand.”

From Cotton Grower Magazine – March 2019


Jim Steadman is Senior Editor for Cotton Grower magazine. He has spent more than 40 years in agricultural writing and marketing.
Πηγή: Cotton Grower



Εγγραφείτε στο καθημερινό μας newsletter